My thesis: CAUSATION AND THE UNIVERSE

A bridge between the nineteen hundreds and the two thousands (X₂)

I wrote my book and shared it online through this channel, continuously refining it over time – publishing, retracting, and reposting as I made corrections, alterations, and additions since at least 2019. Now, as of April 2026, my book has been published in its final paper edition. I am very pleased with the result. After sixteen years of authoring these 136 pages, I’ve finally learned my lesson: if I ever publish a book online again, it will be a sudden release of a finished edition, only after the paper version is out, and it will be a completely new and original work. Why? Because…

…Please do not borrow my conclusions and examples without giving me credit. You know who you are – from Portugal, Singapore, Hong Kong, Bangladesh, Canada, and, perhaps most crucially, a certain physics team on YouTube from the US. To that American team: I hereby give you the chance to add me to your credibility list in your video descriptions on YouTube. You’ve done it for others. The choice is yours. Thank you!

I understand the difference between stealing and independently arriving at the same epiphany. Since authoring my work, I’ve noticed that many scientific groups and individuals have developed some ideas similar to mine. Their contributions, however, always bring a different perspective, use distinct examples, and take unique directions.

I don’t make accusations lightly, but in the case I mentioned about the physics team on Youtube, my suspicions are justified. In the other instances, it’s just the sudden spikes in my analytics – combined with a lack of contact – that raise my concerns. If it happened once, it could happen again. And it has, with one of my other books in a different field.

In that case, a general and his associate, a lieutenant colonel, took ideas and entire concepts from my book without attribution and incorporated them into their own presumptuous book. This landed the general a place in the Royal academy of war science in Sweden. If you’re curious about how I can be so certain, just send me a message. I’d be happy to explain.

Unfortunately, a minority of unimaginative professionals will always resort to such tactics in their pursuit of prestige, is my conclusion.

The author

The first part of my book (up to and including page 94), is my problem shooting concerning some of the physics problems that we up to now haven’t been able to solve satisfiedly. There are many explaining graphs in this book. This is not a TOE or a GUT. What is? My theory is to a high extent a theory of causality. B follows on A. Therefore, although my book does not deal with the abstract subject, I lean towards Roger Penrose’s Penrose diagram because of its causality, rather than the “many worlds” hypothesis.