The first section (65 p.) of my book is my problem shooting concerning some of the physics problems that we up to now haven’t been able to solve satisfiedly. The different parts of the theory converge wholly accordingly to Karl Popper’s criteriums for what science is. The full theory is stringent, consistent and nearly entirely causal. There are many explaining graphs in this book. This is not a TOE or a GUT. What is?

________________________________________________________________________________________

Isaac Newton’s first law states that if a body is at rest or moving at a constant speed in a straight line, it will remain at rest or keep moving in a straight line at constant speed unless it is acted upon by a force.

A refutation of Isaac Newton’s first law:

1. If a body is in orbital motion with a given sufficient apogee and perigee it will stay in orbit in an energy-conserving state if there aren’t any added adequate amounts of accurately directed energy to it.
2. Thermal energy is required either direct or indirect to make matter move in straight or otherwise non-orbital trajectories.

My work is based on Einstein’s theory of relativity. I stand on Albert Einstein’s shoulders as Albert Einstein stood on Isaac Newton’s shoulders. Isaac Newton lived in a time when the Universe was considered static and constant by scientists. There was no beginning and no end, and the Universe certainly didn’t expand. Because of the false belief of the time that the Universe was static and constant he couldn’t, without revoking that common notion of the times, have concluded what I have concluded that actually the orbital motion is the energy-conserving motion that need a force to act upon a body for it to not keep orbiting around a larger object, and that it is the body which need an extra force of energy to leave a gravitational field. Newton didn’t consider a starting block for everything, like the Big bang. And what is the Big bang? It is added energy creating matter moving in straight trajectories. What is orbital movement again? It is an energy-conserving motion for a body.

And as for Albert Einstein, he came up with his theory of Relativity, his life work, at the time when the Universe was still being considered static and constant. Einstein was unable to realize that a body must have an absolute speed limit, and because of that the Special theory of Relativity results in an all-out theoretic assumption about time dilation. Albert’s relativistic theory is a hypothesis somersault since his theory presupposes no speed limit for a body. And bodies in motion are considered to have relativistic speed by Einstein even though he didn’t believe in an absolute speed scale, or precisely because he didn’t believe in an absolute speed scale. And why wouldn’t he have considered bodies to have relativistic speed when the Universe was considered static and constant by him and his academic peers?

________________________________________________________________________________________

My thesis:

Thermal energy Vs. Gravitational pull

________________________________________________________________________________________

Let us slap the Pythagorean theorem onto the universe. In the image above, Objects a and b separate from each other in a ninety degrees angle at a speed well below the speed of light. The distance to the allegedly ascertained beginning of the universe is 13 billion lightyears for both Object a and Object b. The distance between Object a and Object b is then 18 billion lightyears. For the GN-z11 to be 32 billion lightyears apart from our galaxy, our galaxy must be 23 billion lightyears old. That is if we had been located at the edge of the universe as well as the GN-z11 had been located at the other edge. Obviously, we are not located at the edge of the visible universe. Since most of the objects in the universe have a velocity well below the speed of light, we should expect the universe to be much, much older than 13 (or perhaps 23) billion lightyears of age. 32 billion lightyears are how far we can see today, given that we are correct in our assessment of the distance from our galaxy to the GN-z11. Say that most of the galaxies in the known universe have a velocity of about 67 km per second. 67x60x60x24x365= 2,112,912,000 km or 2 billion km per year. So, if the assessment for the expansion speed is correct, then the age of the universe must be more than 300,000km/s x 0,00067km= 201 times greater than we expected. 23 billion lightyears x 201= 4.6 trillion years of actual age, but supposedly more. Unless there was inflation. I have imaginary set up the calculation according to the Pythagorean theorem for a right-angled triangle i.e., a²+b²=c² and then calculated the square root of the result to get a horizontal distance between Object a and Object b in the image above.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Teaser for my total rebuttal of Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness theorem, also in the book.

So we have two statements:

1. A means that A is unprovable
2. False formulas are unprovable

One can easily replace (1) with either “False A is unprovable” or “True A is unprovable”.

(- +) = (-) (imaginary)

(+ +) = (+) (true)

(- -) = (+) (true)

(+ -) = (-) (imaginary)

The following is an explanation of what I am claiming here:

1. We would get (- +) = (-) (imaginary) if A could be false and provable, which it cannot. False propositions cannot be proved true.
2. We get the formula (+ +) = (+) (true) if it is true and provable.
3. We get (- -) = (+) (true) if it is false and unprovable.
4. Thus we get the formula (+ -) = (-) (imaginary) for the true and unprovable.

________________________________________________________________________________________